USPTO serial 75694031
CLEANCUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2962699Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 21, 2005
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEANCUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Twickenham Middlesex TW1 1RQ, GB
Twickenham Middlesex TW1 1RQ, GB
LOWER EARLEY, READING, BERKSHIRE, GB
Danehill, Reading, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK B HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Television, video or other image processing apparatus, namely amplifiers, up-converters, down-converters, standards converters, processors, encoders, decoders, screen optimisers, noise reducers, digital video effects processors, filters, compressors and receivers; home theatre apparatus, namely home theatre display converters, display processors and screen optimisers; audio signal processors; video signal processors; video processors; video recorders; video reproduction equipment, namely video cameras, televisions, and video monitors; video, audio or video and audio signal testing, monitoring, recording, reproducing and processing apparatus, namely signal testers, monitors, signal generators, analysers, video tape players, switchers, routers, time base correctors, synchronisers, recorders, serialisers, deserialisers, distributors, mixers, modulators, demodulators, equalisers, color correctors, interfaces, oscillators and buffers; television standards converters; film to video transfer devices; amplifiers, buffers; distributors, signal generators and converters, all for use with audio signals, video signals and combinations of audio and video signals; blank video tapes, blank compact discs and blank digital video discs; television coders and decoders; digital video effects generators; video distributors and mixers; converters for the conversion of a video signal for the purpose of display in a television; computer software and computer hardware all for producing video effects; computer software and computer hardware for the operation, control and monitoring of all of the aforesaid; audio, video and audio and video signal processors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Snell & Wilcox Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Snell & Wilcox Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by SNELL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Snell & Wilcox Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CLEANCUT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |