USPTO serial 75694406
24HOURNOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 24HOURNOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Ana, CA
Santa Ana, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Lautsch
GEOFFREY S WORKS TFHC INCSTE 300-D3020 OLD RANCH PKWYSEAL BEACH, CA 90740Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BILLING SERVICES FOR USERS OF CHAT ROOMS AND BULLETIN BOARDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING ON-LINE CHAT ROOMS FOR TRANSMISSION OF AUDIO, VIDEO AND TYPED MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS CONCERNING CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS MATTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | HOSTING CHAT ROOMS OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER OVER A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR THE TRANSMISSION OF AUDIO, VIDEO AND TYPED MESSAGES AMONG COMPUTER USERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TFHC, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TFHC, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named 24HOURNOW
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |