Drawing for THINGS

USPTO serial 75695708

THINGS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINGS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. MACK WEBNER

W MACK WEBNER SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20037

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH DATA FILES, DATABASES, AND APPLICATION SERVERS ON BOTH LOCAL AND GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS WHICH ALLOWS SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS TO VIEW, MANIPULATE AND GRAPHICALLY DISPLAY SOFTWARE FUNCTIONALITYACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 24, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Mar 7, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Mar 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 13, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 13, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 4, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 4, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 30, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 13, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 11, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 27, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 24, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 7, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance