USPTO serial 75698739
WELLTRONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WELLTRONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George S. Pavlik
George S. Pavlik Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC2 N. LaSalle St.Suite 1300Chicago, IL 60602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | pumps, namely, submersible and non-submersible pumps, end suction pumps, split case pumps, turbine pumps, centrifugal pumps, vertically shafted pumps and self-priming pumps | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electronic control units for pumps, namely, submersible and non-submersible pumps end suction pumps, split case pumps, turbine pumps, centrifugal pumps, vertically shafted pumps, and self-priming pumps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EX5M | SOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EX5D | SOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 2, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |