Drawing for GRANDMA SCHITTHED'S OUTHOUSE BROWN

USPTO serial 75702008

GRANDMA SCHITTHED'S OUTHOUSE BROWN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRANDMA SCHITTHED'S OUTHOUSE BROWN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY L. COSTELLIA

JEFFREY L COSTELLIA NIXON PEADOBY LLP8180 GREENSBORO DRSTE 800MCLEAN, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Beer and aleACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 29, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 29, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 21, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 1, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 1, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 24, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance