USPTO serial 75704252
21E
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 21E?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR PROVIDING ACCESS TO INTERACTIVE BROADCASTS AND ON-LINE COMMERCE, MULTIMEDIA AND AUDIO-VISUAL PRESENTATIONS, AND PROGRAMMING GUIDES, AND SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | AUCTIONING GOODS AND SERVICES THROUGH A LIVE PRESENTATION ON-LINE | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING FINANCIAL INFORMATION, WEATHER, PUBLIC OPINION POLLING, SPORTS ON COMPUTER NETWORKS, GLOBAL COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, SATELLITES AND FIBER DISTRIBUTION, AND PRESENTING, ENTERTAINMENT AND COMMERCE ON THE SAME PAGE AS TELEVISION-LIKE INTERFARE ALLOWING VIEWERS TO VIEW ENTERTAINMENT PROPERTIES AND COMMERCE PROPERTIES TOGETHER | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES INCLUDING THE PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF INTERACTIVE TELEVISION-TYPE PROGRAMS AND MULTI-USER GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |