Drawing for TIME FLYZ

USPTO serial 75706346

TIME FLYZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIME FLYZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason M. Drangel

JASON M DRANGEL BAZERMAN & DRANGEL PC60 E 42ND ST STE 1158NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014jewelry boxes and jewelry cases made of precious metal; non-monetary coins; medals; jewelry; jewelry of precious metal; precious gemstones; costume jewelry, namely, rings, earrings, cuff links, bracelets, brooches, watch chains, chains and necklaces, long neck chains and tie pins; horological and chronometric instruments, namely, watches, wrist watches, alarm clocks, small clocks, chronometersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 23, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 6, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 22, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 3, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 24, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 8, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 25, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 2, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance