USPTO serial 75711819
SCSIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2808907Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 27, 2004
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCSIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Rabin
STEVEN M. RABIN RABIN & BERDO, P.C.SUITE 500, 1101 14TH STREET, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICROCOMPUTER, HOST COMPUTERS, MICROPROCESSORS, DATA STORAGE MEMORY, BAR-CODE SCANNERS, DATA PROCESSORS, CENTRAL PROCESSORS, DISK DRIVERS, DATA-READ-ONLY DRIVERS, COMPUTER INPUT-OUTPUT PROCESSORS, DISK DRIVES, INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CHIPS, CIRCUIT BOARDS, SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES, NETWORK INTERFACE CARDS, SEMICONDUCTOR CHIPS, PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS, VLSI CHIPS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 8, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 15, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 15, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 24, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |