USPTO serial 75713433
LISTEN.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LISTEN.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel
SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE THAT ENABLES USERS TO PLAY AND PROGRAM ENTERTAINMENT-RELATED VIDEO, TEXT AND MULTIMEDIA CONTENT; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FEATURING ENTERTAINMENT-RELATED VIDEO; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; PRERECORDED COMPACT DISCS, DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS, AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPES AND DISCS, AND OTHER STORAGE MEDIA, NAMELY, EPHEMERAL RECORDINGS, ALL FEATURING MUSIC, ENTERTAINMENT, AND MUSIC-AND ENTERTAINMENT-RELATED AUDIO VIDEO, TEXT AND MULTIMEDIA CONTENT; COMPACT DISC PLAYERS; COMPACT DISC RECORDERS, COMPACT DISC REPRODUCTION DEVICES, NAMELY, RIPPERS AND ENCODERS; AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPE AND DISC PLAYERS; AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPE AND DISC RECORDERS; AUDIO AND VIDEO TAPE AND DISC REPRODUCTION DEVICES, NAMELY, BURNERS, RIPPERS AND ENCODERS; VIDEO PLAYERS; VIDEO RECORDERS; AUDIO AND VIDEO REPRODUCTION DEVICES, NAMELY, BURNERS, RIPPERS AND ENCODERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |