USPTO serial 75713689
EVERSAVE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EVERSAVE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY BETH KERRIGAN
MARY BETH KERRIGAN MORSE BARNES BROWN & PENDLETON PCRESERVOIR PL1601 TRAPELO RDWALTHAM, MA 02451Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING PRODUCT DISCOUNT INFORMATION ABOUT A WIDE RANGE OF GENERAL MERCHANDISE AND CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ACTIVE | Oct 23, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |