USPTO serial 75714355
Serial No. 75714355
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, LAURIEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75714355?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sally M. Abel
SALLY M ABEL FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQ STE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; computer software that enables users to play and program music and entertainment-related audio, video, text an multimedia content; computer software featuring musical sound recordings; computer software featuring entertainment-related audio, video, text and multimedia content; computer peripherals; prerecorded compact discs, digital video discs, phonograph records audio and video tapes and discs, and other storage media, namely, ephemeral recordings, all featuring music entertainment, and music-and entertainment-related audio video, text and multimedia content; compact disc players; compact disc recorders; compact disc reproduction devices; audio and video tape and disc players; audio and video tape and disc recorders; audio and video tape and disc reproduction devices; audio and video players; audio and video recorders; audio and video reproduction devices, namely, burners, rippers and encoders; and instruction manuals supplied therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |