USPTO serial 75714361
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
COMPREHENSIVE SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, LLC
GOLDEN, CO
Other trademarks owned by COMPREHENSIVE SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, LLC
Comprehensive Software Systems, Ltd
Golden, CO
Other trademarks owned by Comprehensive Software Systems, Ltd
Comprehensive Software Systems, Ltd
Golden, CO
Other trademarks owned by Comprehensive Software Systems, Ltd
COMPREHENSIVE SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
GOLDEN, CO
Other trademarks owned by COMPREHENSIVE SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa A. Osman
Lisa A. Osman DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP1400 Wewatta Street, Suite 400IP DepartmentDENVER, CO 80202-5549| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software that allows securities brokerage firms to manage their entire business through use of one integrated system | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 16, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2022 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |