Drawing for SKYGATE

USPTO serial 75728409

SKYGATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SKYGATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adrienne L. White

ADRIENNE L WHITE BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHIS, LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR USE IN THE FURTHER MANUFACTURE OF ANTENNAS; ANTENNASABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 29, 2002ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 29, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 29, 2002OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 6, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 11, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 7, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 20001.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Dec 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance