USPTO serial 75733593
EIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Walnut Creek, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph L. Strabala
JOSEPH L STRABALA LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH L STRABALAONE EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1020SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3600UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MANAGING SOFTWARE, NAMELY SOFTWARE FOR ANALYSIS, MONITORING, MANAGEMENT, REMEDIATION, CONTAINMENT, ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT OF TOXIC MATERIALS | ACTIVE | May 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |