USPTO serial 75734008
CUSTOMERHUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CUSTOMERHUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
British Columbia V7M 3M6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN A. SMITH
SUSAN A SMITH KENYON & KENYON333 W SAN CARLOS ST STE 600SAN JOSE, CA 95110-2731UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN MANAGING CUSTOMER CONTACTS AND SALES, MARKETING OF PRODUCTS AT TRADE SHOWS AND SEMINARS, THROUGH TELEMARKETING CAMPAIGNS, AND THROUGH DIRECT-MAIL CAMPAIGNS, ORGANIZATION OF CUSTOMER SERVICE, NAMELY, TRACKING ORDERS, SENDING ORDER CONFIRMATIONS, TRACKING OF REPAIR AND WARRANTY ORDERS, ACCOUNTING, AND OFFICE ADMINISTRATION, NAMELY, MAINTENANCE OF PERSONNEL RECORDS AND COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED BY FACSIMILE, TELEPHONE, ELECTRONIC MAIL AND VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |