USPTO serial 75734914
WEBAUDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBAUDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Peterborough, NH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN CHAPMAN
KATHLEEN CHAPMAN DISHONG LAW OFFICE765 GREENVILLE RDMASON, NH 03048-4112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | technical assistance and consulting in assessing strengths and weaknesses in an existing interactive marketing program, including analyzing strategy, web site design, web site promotion, web site traffic, web site suppliers, and web site customer satisfaction | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1998 |
| 042 | computer consulting services for web site design modification, web site traffic analysis, and customer and supplier analysis in the field of sales and marketing | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |