Drawing for COMMERCE KINETIX

USPTO serial 75736037

COMMERCE KINETIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with COMMERCE KINETIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Dell Long

MICHAEL DELL LONG RATOZA LONG, PC121 S W MORRISON ST STE 900PORTLAND, OR 97204-3164UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009TELEPHONE AND COMPUTER HARDWARE FOR USE WITH TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE FOR USE WITH TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, NAMELY, SOFTWARE TO FACILITATE COMMUNICATION AND MESSAGINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance