USPTO serial 75741382
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Twickenham Middlesex TWI 1RQ, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B HARRISON VENABLE BAETJER HOWARD & CIVILETTI LLP1201 NEW YORK AVE N WSTE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | digital signal processors, television standards converters; video processing, recording and reproduction equipment, namely signal testers, monitors, converters, processors, encoders, decoders, signal generators, analyzers, players, signal optimizers, noise reducers, switchers, routers, correctors, synchronizers, amplifiers, serializers and deserializers; film to video transfer devices, namely, encoders, amplifiers, converters, modulators, mixers, equalizers, synchronizers, color correctors, noise reducers, and signal compressors; blank video tapes and compact discs; parts therefor for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |