USPTO serial 75742677
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephanie Furgang Adwar, Esq.
STEPHANIE FURGANG ADWAR FURGANG & ADWAR LLP2 CROSFIELD AVE STE 210WEST NYACK, NY 10994UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES AND PRODUCTION SERVICES OF ALL TYPES, TOWELS, PAPER AND TOILETRY PRODUCTS, CHRONOMETERS, CD- ROMS, LIGHT FIXTURES OF ALL TYPES, SUNGLASSES, SPORTS EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORIES, ANIMATION, STATIONERY PRODUCTS, JEWELRY OF ALL TYPES, STUFFED TOYS AND TOYS, ADVERTISING SERVICES OF ALL TYPES, UMBRELLAS, WALL AND FLOOR COVERINGS OF ALL TYPES, AND THE LIKE In International Class 42 | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |