Drawing for EQOP

USPTO serial 75742677

EQOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EQOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephanie Furgang Adwar, Esq.

STEPHANIE FURGANG ADWAR FURGANG & ADWAR LLP2 CROSFIELD AVE STE 210WEST NYACK, NY 10994UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES AND PRODUCTION SERVICES OF ALL TYPES, TOWELS, PAPER AND TOILETRY PRODUCTS, CHRONOMETERS, CD- ROMS, LIGHT FIXTURES OF ALL TYPES, SUNGLASSES, SPORTS EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORIES, ANIMATION, STATIONERY PRODUCTS, JEWELRY OF ALL TYPES, STUFFED TOYS AND TOYS, ADVERTISING SERVICES OF ALL TYPES, UMBRELLAS, WALL AND FLOOR COVERINGS OF ALL TYPES, AND THE LIKE In International Class 42ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 24, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 24, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 19, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 19, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 29, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 5, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 24, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 5, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 4, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 13, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 13, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 12, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance