Drawing for AMADEUS E-UNIVERSITY

USPTO serial 75743060

AMADEUS E-UNIVERSITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMADEUS E-UNIVERSITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret A. Boulware

MARGARET A BOULWARE JENKENS & GILCHRIST1100 LOUISIANA ST STE 1800HOUSTON, TX 77002-5214UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing training courses and tutorials via a global computer information network for travel agencies and travel industry professionals in the field of business skills, business development, business management and in computerized on-line reservations and ticketing systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 6, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 30, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 9, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 17, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 17, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 1, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 27, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Dec 1, 2000AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 2, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance