Drawing for E-BUSINESS ENGINEERING AT WORK

USPTO serial 75749219

E-BUSINESS ENGINEERING AT WORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOHR, AMY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-BUSINESS ENGINEERING AT WORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry E. Bretschneider

BARRY E BRETSCHNEIDER MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1888UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consulting services pertaining to customer relationship management; payroll preparation; employment recruitment services; travel management services; management of customer services call centers for others; computerized order entry services for third parties via the global communications network; marketing analysis services; human resource administration; business consultation in the fields of knowledge management and employee performance management; business asset management services; inventory control; business management and consulting services in the field of order management and distribution; business consultation services in the field of workflow management; and business management services, namely, providing expertise in the area of decision supportACTIVE—
036Administration of employee benefit plans; electronic payment, namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data, invoice payment data, and collection data; insurance claims processing; and financial planning and managementACTIVE—
042Pre-printing services, namely, catalogue preparation services for others; computer consultation services, namely, data mining management; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer services, namely, designing web sites for others; integration of legacy computer systems; maintenance of legacy computer software systems, and providing data warehousing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 23, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance