USPTO serial 75749220
E-BUSINESS ENGINEERING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOHR, AMY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with E-BUSINESS ENGINEERING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry E. Bretschneider
BARRY E BRETSCHNEIDER MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1888UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Customer relationship management and customer service performed for others, catalogue preparation and management for others, payroll and benefits preparation and management, recruiting and training services, expense and time reporting services, travel administration services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Electronic transmission and processing of bill and invoice payment and collection data; claims processing; management of on-line transactions, financial planning and management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Data mining, contract management, channel management, set up and management of call centers; order entry, provisioning and fulfillment; marketing analysis services; human resource administration, performance management and knowledge management; skills management, supply chain, vendor/partner/channel management, procurement and asset management, inventory control, order management and distribution; security, network and messaging infrastructure provision, workflow management, decision support, web hosting and design, information technology strategic planning, legacy system integration and maintenance, data warehousing, manufacturing control and document management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |