USPTO serial 75752748
'ROUND THE HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 'ROUND THE HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kamenetsky
Jeffrey H. Kamenetsky Novak Druce + Quigg LLP525 Okeechobee Blvd, 15th FloorWest Palm Beach, FL 33401UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Atico International USA Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Atico International USA Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named 'ROUND THE HOUSE
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 14, 2001 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |