USPTO serial 75754315
SMARTPRINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 1, 2005
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTPRINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES M. SLATTERY
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCHP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic device combining fingerprint sensors and smart cards for strong user authentication and access control to computer systems and physical locations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |