Drawing for MERLIN SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 75755753

MERLIN SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MERLIN SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DORAN J INGALLS

DORAN J INGALLS CLARK, WILSON800-885 W GEORGIA STVANCOUVER, BC V6C 3H1CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO BACKUP OR ARCHIVE DATA STORED ON LOCAL DISK DRIVES AND NETWORKED STORAGE APPLIANCES; SOFTWARE FOR SENDING AND RECEIVING FAXES, VOICE COMMUNICATIONS AND ELECTRONIC MAIL; SOFTWARE FOR CONFERENCING VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; OPERATIONAL SYSTEM MANAGEMENT UTILITY SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ACCESSING INFORMATION DIRECTORIES THAT MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; SOFTWARE FOR COMPRESSING AND EXPANDING COMPUTER FILES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO ENHANCE THE AUDIO-VISUAL CAPABILITIES OF MULTIMEDIA APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, FOR THE INTEGRATION OF TEXT, AUDIO, GRAPHICS, STILL IMAGES AND MOVING PICTURES; AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR INTERNAL AND INTEROFFICE MESSAGINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 12, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 16, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Sep 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 9, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance