Drawing for COMMONPLACES

USPTO serial 75757110

COMMONPLACES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMMONPLACES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John D. Mitchell, Jr.

JOHN D MITCHELL JR HUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMAR101 FED STBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Online information services, namely providing databases and website links to other content providers in the field of employment opportunities for adolescents and young adultsACTIVE—
039Online information services, namely providing databases and website links to other content providers in the fields of travel information services and travel agency services for adolescents and young adultsACTIVE—
041Online information services, namely providing databases and website links to other content providers in the fields of entertainment, movies, music, and social activities for adolescents and young adultsACTIVE—
042Online information services, namely providing databases and website links to other content providers in the fields of beauty, fitness, health, relationships, and politics for adolescents and young adultsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 13, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance