USPTO serial 75757394
CUSTOMCALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 3, 2002
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CUSTOMCALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ruffalo, Cody & Associates, Inc.
Cedar Rapids, IA
MCLEODUSA MARKET RESPONSE, INC.
CEDAR RAPIDS, IA
Cedar Rapids, IA
CEDAR RAPIDS, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATTHEW J. KRIGBAUM
MATTHEW KRIGBAUM MOYER & BERGMAN PLC2720 1ST AVE NECEDAR RAPIDS, IA 52402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | providing customized fundraising services for non-profit organizations, universities, college fraternities and sororities, and other organizations and institutions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ruffalo, Cody & Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MCLEODUSA MARKET RESPONSE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RUFFALOCODY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RUFFALOCODY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named CUSTOMCALL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |