USPTO serial 75757405
AIRFLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3687858Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 29, 2009
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AIRFLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta S. Bren
Roberta S. Bren MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Fixed base operations for aircraft, namely, managing aircraft for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Fixed base operations for aircraft, namely, storing aircraft for others; providing flight information to others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Providing weather information to others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AirFlite, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AirFlite, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AirFlite, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AIRFLITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |