Drawing for RIP SQUEAK

USPTO serial 75757786

RIP SQUEAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIP SQUEAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary A. Harris, Esq.

MARY A HARRIS ESQ MARY A HARRIS, ATTORNEY AT LAW960 TORO STSAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motion pictures, slides, film strips, audio tapes, video tapes, and electronic discs containing cartoon animation and pre-recorded soundtracks; computer screen saver programs, computer mouse pads, and refrigerator magnetsACTIVE—
024Printed cloth, namely, for bed, bath, table, and household linens; cloth decorative ornaments; and potpourri bagsACTIVE—
028Toys, games and playthings, namely, jigsaw puzzles, toy action figures and accessories therefor, plush toys; Christmas tree ornamentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 11, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 9, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 2, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 13, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 19, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 17, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 8, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance