USPTO serial 75757852
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carla B. Oakley
CARLA B OAKLEY BROBCCK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | PROVIDING ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE CONTAINING RESEARCH, ANALYSIS, COMMENTARY, SURVEYS, SUMMARIES, REPORTS, STOCK PERFORMANCE CHARTS, TOOLS, NAMELY, COMPUTER GENERATED/ASSISTED INVESTMENT DECISION SUPPORT AND INVESTMENT MONITORING, MANAGEMENT, TRACKING, MEASUREMENT AND VALUATION SERVICES, IN THE FIELDS OF INVESTMENTS, STOCKS, FINANCIAL MARKETS AND ASSET MANAGEMENT; FINANCIAL RESEARCH PROVIDED ON-LINE; INVESTMENT ANALYSIS OF ON-LINE BUSINESS STRATEGIES; FINANCIAL ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING ON-LINE BULLETIN BOARD SERVICES, ON-LINE COMMUNITY SERVICES, NAMELY, THE SHARING OF INFORMATION FOR USE IN INVESTMENT AND MARKET RESEARCH, AND ON-LINE CHAT ROOM SERVICES, IN THE FIELDS OF INVESTMENTS, STOCKS, FINANCIAL MARKETS AND ASSET MANAGEMENT | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |