Drawing for HOMMAGE 1492

USPTO serial 75758023

HOMMAGE 1492

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOONEYHAM, JANICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOMMAGE 1492?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID O'REILLY

1800 BRIDGEGATE ST STE 200WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
034Tobacco products, namely, cigarette papers, cigarette tubes with and without filters, cigarette filters; smoker's articles, namely, ashtrays not of precious metals, cigarette lighters not of precious metals, pocket machines for rolling and stuffing cigarettes, and matchesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 20, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 20, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 17, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 9, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 9, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 19, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance