USPTO serial 75759126
INTERACTIVE WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERACTIVE WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL C. PINDERSKI
PAUL C PINDERSKI PINDERSKI & PINDERSKI, LTD115 W COLFAXP O BOX 889PALATINE, IL 60078-0889Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | hang tags for goods in the nature of CD-ROMs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Product merchandising, being development of CD-ROMs to promote the sales of goods or services of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Electronic publishing services, namely publishing text and graphics of others on CD-ROMs for use in client advertising and promotion of their products or services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clean Air Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Clean Air Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named INTERACTIVE WEAR
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |