USPTO serial 75763049
E DO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E DO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bonnie G.KLEIN
LAURA GENOVESE MILLER COZEN O'CONNOR1900 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | procurement for corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, non-profit corporations, associations and individuals, namely, purchasing office supplies, furniture and equipment over a global computer network; mail room services, namely, mail sorting, handling and receiving tangible and electronic mail; copying of documents for others; providing business management services, namely, conference room scheduling | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | making reservation and booking for tempory lodging; providing personal concierge services for executives; and placing orders for catering services, all performed by employing electronic mail and global computer network communications; providing catering services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |