Drawing for BMN THE BAD MOVIE NETWORK

USPTO serial 75776440

BMN THE BAD MOVIE NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BILLINGS, JESSIE W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BMN THE BAD MOVIE NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley J. Gross

BRADLEY J GROSS BECKER & POLIAKOFF, PA5201 BLUE LAGOON DRSTE 100MIAMI, FL 33126

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRE-RECORDED VIDEOTAPES, LASER DISKS AND MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING ENTERTAINMENT AND SPORTING EVENTSACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, GOLF SHIRTS, POLO SHIRTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, SWEAT SUITS, SWEATERS, BOXER SHORTS, AND CAPSACTIVE—
038CABLE TELEVISION AND VIDEO BROADCASTING SERVICESACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY VIDEOTAPE AND MOTION PICTURE FILM PRODUCTION SERVICES AND PROVIDING TELEVISION AND RADIO PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF - COMEDY, DRAMA, HORROR, SCIENCE FICTION, SPORTS AND RECREATION, MYSTERY, ADULT ENTERTAINMENT, DOCUMENTARIES, ANIMATED CARTOONS, NEWS, COMMERCIAL ADVERTISING, CONCERTS AND OTHER LIVE AND TAPED ENTERTAINMENT EVENTS, SYNDICATED TELEVISION RE-RUNS, AND ORIGINAL IN-HOUSE ENTERTAINMENT PRODUCTIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2003LEXTLATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST—
May 29, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 5, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 25, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2001LSOULATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE—
Sep 26, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 20, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 26, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 4, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 2, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 9, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance