Drawing for LAVERNE

USPTO serial 75779343

LAVERNE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VAVONESE, DANIEL P
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAVERNE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy O. Dix

JOHN M KIM GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLPSTE 11004365 EXECUTIVE DRSAN DIEGO, CA 92121-2133

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020furnitureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 14, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 22, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 29, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 29, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 19, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 27, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 27, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 2, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 3, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 10, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 25, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance