Drawing for DIGITAL MUSIC ACCESS TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 75782707

DIGITAL MUSIC ACCESS TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DIGITAL MUSIC ACCESS TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Chris Wilson

CHRIS WILSON ARNOLD & PORTER555 TWELFTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SOUND AND VIDEO RECORDINGS CONTAINING MUSIC-RELATED CONTENT AND MATERIAL; CONSUMER ELECTRONICS DEVICES, FOR THE RECORDING, PLAYING AND TRANSMITTING OF SOUND AND VIDEO, NAMELY, AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDERS, CAMCORDERS, SYNCHRONIZERS, PROJECTION SPEAKERS, DIGITAL REVERBS, SIGNAL PROCESSORS, PROJECTION SCREENS, MICROPHONES, HEADPHONES, INTERCOMS, RADIOS, CABLE TELEVISION RECEIVERS AND DECODERS, CINEMA SOUND PROCESSORS FOR MOTION PICTURE SOUND TRACKS; MULTI-CHANNEL SOUND PROCESSORS INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; AUDIO/VIDEO AMPLIFIERS AND RECEIVERS; TELEVISION RECEIVERS, VIDEO MONITORS, VIDEO TUNERS, AUDIO, VIDEO AND DIGITAL DISC PLAYERS, AUDIO, VIDEO AND DIGITAL DISC DUBBING DECKS, DVD PLAYERS; REMOTE CONTROL UNITS FOR ALL THOSE DEVICES SPECIFICALLY CONTAINED IN THIS DESCRIPTION; COMPUTERS; COMPUTER MICROCHIPS; COMPUTER MEMORY; TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES, NAMELY, TELEPHONES, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR RECORDING, PLAYING AND TRANSMITTING SOUND AND VIDEO, SATELLITE DISHES; TELEVISIONS; SET-TOP BOXES FOR TELEVISIONS; CAR RADIOS, AND MODEMS; ALL CONFORMING TO CERTAIN TECHNICAL STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS ISSUED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED COPYING OF COPYRIGHTED MATERIALACTIVE—
038TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, TRANSMISSION OF SOUND AND VIDEO VIA WIRE, TERRESTRIAL WIRELESS AND SATELLITE NETWORKS IN DIGITAL FORM THROUGH THE USE OF COMPUTERS, RADIOS AND TELEVISIONS ALL CONFORMING TO THE SPECIFICATION ISSUED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED COPYING OF COPYRIGHTED MATERIALACTIVE—
042TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, TRANSMISSION OF SOUND AND VIDEO VIA WIRE, TERRESTRIAL WIRELESS AND SATELLITE NETWORKS IN DIGITAL FORM THROUGH THE USE OF COMPUTERS, RADIOS AND TELEVISIONS ALL CONFORMING TO THE SPECIFICATION ISSUED BY THE APPLICANT TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED COPYING OF COPYRIGHTED MATERIALACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 12, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 11, 2005CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Jan 11, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jan 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 8, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance