Drawing for SEAL SAVER

USPTO serial 75790963

SEAL SAVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEAL SAVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Artz

JAMES A DIMITRIJEVS MCDONALD HOPKINS CO., LPA2100 BANK ONE CTR 600 SUPERIOR AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007PUMPING ASSEMBLIES CONSISTING OF A PUMP, A PUMP SEAL, AND A LANTERN RING OR FLUSHING RING FOR INDUSTRIAL AND TRANSPORTATION APPLICATIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 5, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 25, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 9, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 9, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 23, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 9, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance