USPTO serial 75790990
TEGRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEGRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Longview, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David G. Henry
DAVID G HENRY900 WASHINGTON AVEP O BOX 1470WACO, TX 76703-1470Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND INTEGRATED CLIENT/SERVER COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED FOR DATA, INFORMATION AND EQUIPMENT INTEGRATION IN MANUFACTURING FACILITIES; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; ENGINEERING SERVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA IN-PERSON, FAX, CORRESPONDENCE, AND E-MAIL CONSULTATIONS; ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION NETWORK DESIGN FOR OTHERS; AND CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | Jun 28, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |