USPTO serial 75792565
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. Clement
JAMES W CLEMENT5532 S LAKE SHORE DRSTE 2DCHICAGO, IL 60637| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS, AND PROVIDING INSTRUCTION AND DEMONSTRATIONS, ON A METHOD OF SELF-HELP AFTER-CARE TO FOLLOW PSYCHIATRIC OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL COUNSELING AND/OR TREATMENT; TRAINING AND ASSISTING VOLUNTEERS TO CONDUCT EDUCATIONAL CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS, AND TO PROVIDE INSTRUCTION AND DEMONSTRATIONS, ON SAID METHOD OF SELF-HELP AFTER-CARE; AND DISTRIBUTING EXPLANATORY WRITTEN MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE AFORESAID SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING MENTAL HEALTH INFORMATION ON ACTIVITIES RELATING TO DEMONSTRATIONS OF A METHOD OF SELF-HELP AFTER-CARE TO FOLLOW PSYCHIATRIC OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL COUNSELING AND/OR TREATMENT; AND ASSISTING IN ESTABLISHING LOCAL GROUPS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC FOR DEMONSTRATIONS OF SAID METHOD OF SELF-HELP AFTER-CARE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |