USPTO serial 75793338
DB DARK BLUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DB DARK BLUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Oxford OX1 2JD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANDRA S. SNAPP
SANDRA S SNAPP DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1300 I ST NW LOWR 3 WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Articles made from leather and imitation leather, namely, attache cases, backpacks, garment bags for travel, shopping bags, envelopes and pouches for packaging, beach bags, briefcases, handbags, hat boxes for travel, harness straps, straps for luggage and straps for handbags, packet wallets, purses, rucksacks, school satchels, school bags, suitcases, tool bags sold empty, travel bags, vanity cases sold empty, boxes and containers for the storage of cuff links sold empty; canvas backpacks, leather shopping bags, mesh shopping bags, shopping bags with wheels attached and textile shopping bags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Sport, leisure wear and children's wear; namely, bathrobes, bathing caps, bathing suits, bathing trunks, beach shirts and pants, belts, gymnastic suits, pants, shirts, shoes and jackets, sports shoes for soccer, running, rowing and physical training; martial arts training clothing; namely, shirts, jackets, pants, and belts and sashes; jumpers, blazers, men's and women's suits, athletic headwear, socks, hosiery, underwear, jackets, jerseys, leggings, pajamas, pullovers, scarves, shawls, shirts, shoes, ski boots, skirts, school caps, slippers, smocks, t-shits, caps, hats, waistcoasts, golf shoes, ski gloves | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, chess and backgammon, checker, and dominoes board games; plush toys; draught boards; gymnastic and sporting equipment; namely, rugby, soccer, and baseball balls; bats; baseball gloves; body building and exercising machines; manually operated exercise equipment; golf equipment; namely, clubs, balls, shoes and gloves; fencing equipment; namely, masks, gloves, and swords; archery equipment; namely, bows, arrows and targets; tennis equipment; namely, balls, racquets, strings, and nets; shuttlecocks, ice and in-line skates; skiing equipment; namely, skis and poles; ski wax; table tennis equipment; namely, paddles, balls, tables and nets; water skis; protective clothing and equipment for athletic and gymnastic activities; namely, shin guards, shoulder pads, knee and elbow guards for athletic use; hockey sticks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |