USPTO serial 75798689
GROWING FAMILY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GROWING FAMILY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Charles, MO
Earth City, MO
St. Charles, MO
Reno, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol J Hamilton
CAROL J HAMILTON HERZOG CREBS & MCGHEE LLP515 N 6TH ST 24TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Picture frames | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HASCO International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Growing Family, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by HASCO International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hasco I.A. Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named GROWING FAMILY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |