USPTO serial 75801372
TEST PILOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 8, 2002
- Examiner
- RUPP, BRIAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TEST PILOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, The
West Lafayette, IN
PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, The
West Lafayette, IN
PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, The
West Lafayette, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles C. Valauskas
CHARLES C VALAUSKAS APPLEGATE VALAUSKAS ROSEN & BERNSTEIN111 W WASHINGTON STSTE 1555CHICAGO, IL 60602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer software development and consultation services for others in connection with delivering tests and conducting tutorials and surveys and recording, scoring, and/or collecting the responses from same | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 22, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, The
- Other trademarks owned by PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, The
- Other trademarks owned by PURDUE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, The
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TEST PILOT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |