USPTO serial 75807477
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brewster Taylor
BREWSTER TAYLOR LARSON & TAYLOR1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | SOY BASED BEVERAGES USED AS MILK SUBSTITUTE; SOY BASED FOOD BEVERAGE USED AS A MILK SUBSTITUTE | ABANDONED | Feb 6, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |