Drawing for MET HOME

USPTO serial 75810802

MET HOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MET HOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Doreen L. Costa

Doreen L. Costa BAKER & BOTTS, L.L.P.30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZANEW YORK, NY 10112-4498UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electrical lighting fixtures and lampsACTIVE—
020Picture frames and case goods, namely, chests, night stands, cabinets, dining tables, coffee tables, end tables, desks, bed and headboardsACTIVE—
021Table top accessories, namely, bowls, platters made of glass, wood and ceramics, vasesACTIVE—
024Upholstered furniture; bedding, namely, sheets, blankets, bed spreads, bed skirts, decorative pillows and shams, draperies; tabletop accessories, namely, tablecloths not of paper, textile place mats, fabric table runners, and textile napkinsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 9, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 26, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 27, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 27, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 15, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 30, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 25, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance