Drawing for CJ.COM

USPTO serial 75836360

CJ.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CJ.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sarah Lawton

Sarah Lawton Conversant, Inc.101 N. Wacker Dr. Ste. 2300Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042BUSINESS SERVICES PROVIDED ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK FOR OTHERS, NAMELY PROVIDING A LIST OF POTENTIAL ADVERTISERS TO CONTENT PROVIDERS, ASSISTING THE CONTENT PROVIDERS WITH PLACING THE ADVERTISEMENTS ON THEIR WEBSITES, AND MANAGING AND TRACKING THE USE OF THE ADVERTISEMENTSACTIVENov 9, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 21, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 29, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance