USPTO serial 75839195
IJNT.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IJNT.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brandon B. Powell
BRANDON B POWELL UB NETWORKS2030 MAIN ST STE 550IRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, wireless personal communication services including conference calling, toll-free numbers, voicemail, call waiting, and wireless digital messaging services; providing electronic mail and modem services via digital subscriber lines, advanced fiber-optic connections, and high speed broadband; fixed wireless and wired high-speed electronic transmission of voice and data via a public switched telephone network; providing multiple-user access to a public and private computer information networks | ACTIVE | Mar 15, 1999 |
| 042 | Providing computer services, namely, programming for others and computer consulting services, web site development, web site listing, site content filtering, software applications packages and programs available via a computer network; and design and development of computer software for others | ACTIVE | Mar 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |