USPTO serial 75839665
IDEAS THAT MATTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IDEAS THAT MATTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Johannesburg, Gauteng Province, ZA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey N. Aldous
JEFFREY N ALDOUS DAIGLE, SULLIVAN, DUPRE & ALDOUS4262 IMPERIAL WAYPROVO, UT 84604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper cardboard and goods made from these materials not included in other classes; printed matter; bookbinding material; photographs; stationery; adhesives for stationery or household purposes; artists' materials; paintbrushes; typewriters and office requisites (except furniture); instructional and teaching material (except apparatus- plastic materials for packaging (not included in other classes); playing cards; printers' type; printing blocks calendars | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Transport; packaging and storage of goods; travel arrangement | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education services in the field of ongoing public education by mass media in respect of innovative ideas; entertainment by way of live radio and television award shows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |