USPTO serial 75841816
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Austin, TX
Austin, TX
Austin, TX
Austin, TX
Austin, TX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael S. Metteauer
Michael S. Metteauer Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP98 San Jacinto Boulevard, Suite 1100Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for developing object oriented software applications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 8, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |