Drawing for HOLLYWOOD SCREEN TEST

USPTO serial 75842710

HOLLYWOOD SCREEN TEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOLLYWOOD SCREEN TEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dax Alvarez

DAX ALVAREZ BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR 8 ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PLACING ADVERTISEMENTS AND PROMOTIONAL DISPLAYS AND OFFERING SCREEN TESTS WHICH PROMOTE THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS IN A WEB SITE ACCESSED THROUGH COMPUTER NETWORKS AND KIOSKSACTIVE
038COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES, CHAT ROOMS, BULLETIN BOARDS IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT AND ON-LINE SERVICES PROVIDING ELECTRONIC POSTCARDSACTIVE
041PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT RELATED NEWS AND EVENTS VIA GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS AND KIOSKSACTIVE
042COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING INDEXES AND DATABASES OF ENTERTAINMENT RELATED INFORMATION AVAILABLE VIA COMPUTER NETWORKS AND KIOSKSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Feb 25, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 9, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 23, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 3, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 22, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance