USPTO serial 75842764
AEROCEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AEROCEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
L. Grant Foster
L GRANT FOSTER HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 11583SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84147-0583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL DEVICES, NAMELY, PULMONARY DELIVERY SYSTEMS FOR SUCH THINGS AS DRUGS AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |